News Election 2014 Opinion Domestic International Regional Science Economy Teletext: News Sports Live scores 377 Results Soccer Hockey Athletics SM-week Teletext: Sports Culture incandescent bulb ban Culture Film Music Book Arts Services Teletext Weather Blogs SVT Forums Pejl Other Languages Uutiset Ođđasat New Characters Close
It is important not to downplay the problem of drug-related deaths. Better use of available expertise can save the lives of many of the thousands of people each year lose their lives as a result of their medications, writes incandescent bulb ban Swedish pharmacists Chairman Thony Björk in a replica of Michael Hoffmann and Staffan Hägg.
The study addresses the NLS is, as Michael Hoffman and Staffan Hägg writes in his article, estimated that 3,000 people each year had drugs as the main or contributory incandescent bulb ban cause of death.
Michael Hoffman incandescent bulb ban and Staffan Hägg has concluded that perhaps 400 of these had been preventable. It's good that they clarify this. Of course we can not prevent all drug-related deaths - however, a large percentage of them.
While it is important not to downplay the problem. My point was that a better use of, and cooperation between the competencies in the pharmaceutical field of use may prevent death.
We also need more knowledge in this area, not least in terms of multi-medication in the elderly, before we have solid facts about how many deaths that could be said to be drug related and how many of these can be prevented.
We think everyone will agree that every situation in which patients suffer and die is an unfortunate situation and that every death in a general perspective seems "unnecessary". But when possible 3000 deaths described as "totally unnecessary" so many decision makers perceive enough that most of these are preventable. As we pointed out, so you can not prevent most of these deaths whatever we do. That is, we now agree.
For those in the order of 400 deaths a year in which drug problems plays a role so would a lot of these could be prevented by proper measures in health care. It is likely that a wide range of different actions and we do not know in how many of these cases, incandescent bulb ban such as drug utilization reviews can be helpful.
We fully agree with the need for more knowledge in this field and we have to use different skills incandescent bulb ban - including pharmacists - in the smartest way possible and that the problem of incorrect medication use and unnecessary side effects in itself is great. But to suggest the right actions we must proceed from an accurate analysis of what the problem looks like and what causes it. We do not want to downplay the problem. We want to describe it as it is.
Labour Young Alliance that more young people need to get jobs, "How incandescent bulb ban can the SSU, Green Youth and Young Left allow their party to pursue a policy that threatens jobs for us young - they do not want to see more young people into work?" 16 minutes ago
School Gustav incandescent bulb ban Fridolin criticize Education Jan Björklund "Instead of focusing on all the teachers, the emphasis is on some. Why does the Alliance's commitment to only a few teachers? Is there no money left after all the tax cuts? " Yesterday 12:18
2014 election Bengt Westerberg for tonight partiledarintervju "When refugee policy should be measured one must always incandescent bulb ban ask oneself: What would this have meant if the policy had been applied incandescent bulb ban to Jews who fled from Hitler? I would like to see that Jan Björklund highlighted this fundamental moral question " Yesterday 09:47
Services SVT Play TV Guide Weather Open archive Teletext
Contact: opinion@svt.se | Publisher: Mette Friberg | Project Manager: Kenny Adersjö | Executive Editor SVT Opinion: Terje Carlsson | Editors: Agnes Arpi, Malin Sandberg, Marina Ferhatovic, John Carlsson | Sveriges Television AB
http://www.svt.se/statiskt/18f96a8e6f2a/js/libs/orevestoStatistics.js
No comments:
Post a Comment