Please fp, stop underplaying | Magnus thoughts
Leading representatives of the Liberal Party continues to downplay hacking and try to push the burden of guilt for what happened to the Social Democrats. It feels immature but at the same time studied. blacklight Instead of actually define their own approach blacklight to the crimes committed are now being tested angle after angle.
We can start with Ms Sabuni as in SVT's morning show tried on several bagateliseringar. First started with the return to the original line. She said that the most upsetting was that "a 24-year-old down to so many problems" for the Liberal Party. Here then try again a leading folk biased blacklight athletic representatives pretending that the problem with hacking was "24 year old" and that it is his fault. But gee, the party's press secretary've been using the information. It is conceded. So it is a problem where people party leadership is directly involved.
Then continue Sabuni with line number two. It is sossarnas errors. It is "really sad how the Social Democrats make use of this in the election campaign." It is therefore criminal's representatives and pointing the finger at the victim. How Sabuni mean that the Social Democrats ought behaved? Would you say that it's okay that you used the secret information and that it is okay to Liberals benefited from information theft. Why should the victim be quiet in the People's Sweden? Would Sabuni been silent on the situation been reversed? Na.
Since the third line, new for this day. Sabuni trying blacklight to downplay the value of the stolen goods with the words, "I be just as worried when the Social Democrats blacklight trying intuta voters that there are important things blacklight on one of those networks' And so she compares with Fp's equivalent NuBBS which she says is completely uninteresting. Forgive this simple blacklight question, but how can Ms Sabuni know what's on SAPNet and the importance it had?
But not only Sabuni has been on the go. The new acting party secretary Helena Dyrssen also think it's important to try to push the debt burden to the victim. She was upset in the P1 morning over to Marita Ulvskog likened People's Party bagatelliseringar at it as a rape victim always hear in court. The parable was not the best spot I've heard, if you say so, but I understand it. Just as absurd as it is to blame a rape victim for being responsible because she dressed too provocatively as unreasonable is it to accuse the Social Democrats to the Liberal Party had broken into their database. But do not think Helena Dyrssen she tries instead to spin off the line to Marita Ulvskog should ask rape victims to apologize. I do not believe that the Liberal Party is a party without people with spinal, but I am really starting to wonder.
I dare put a hundred on that Leijonborg remain. Electorate is (amazingly) not as impressionable /'re up as you might think. They can hopefully see beyond this kind of event and concentrate on the election campaign will be about: substantive issues.
Leading representatives of the Liberal Party continues to downplay hacking and try to push the burden of guilt for what happened to the Social Democrats. It feels immature but at the same time studied. blacklight Instead of actually define their own approach blacklight to the crimes committed are now being tested angle after angle.
We can start with Ms Sabuni as in SVT's morning show tried on several bagateliseringar. First started with the return to the original line. She said that the most upsetting was that "a 24-year-old down to so many problems" for the Liberal Party. Here then try again a leading folk biased blacklight athletic representatives pretending that the problem with hacking was "24 year old" and that it is his fault. But gee, the party's press secretary've been using the information. It is conceded. So it is a problem where people party leadership is directly involved.
Then continue Sabuni with line number two. It is sossarnas errors. It is "really sad how the Social Democrats make use of this in the election campaign." It is therefore criminal's representatives and pointing the finger at the victim. How Sabuni mean that the Social Democrats ought behaved? Would you say that it's okay that you used the secret information and that it is okay to Liberals benefited from information theft. Why should the victim be quiet in the People's Sweden? Would Sabuni been silent on the situation been reversed? Na.
Since the third line, new for this day. Sabuni trying blacklight to downplay the value of the stolen goods with the words, "I be just as worried when the Social Democrats blacklight trying intuta voters that there are important things blacklight on one of those networks' And so she compares with Fp's equivalent NuBBS which she says is completely uninteresting. Forgive this simple blacklight question, but how can Ms Sabuni know what's on SAPNet and the importance it had?
But not only Sabuni has been on the go. The new acting party secretary Helena Dyrssen also think it's important to try to push the debt burden to the victim. She was upset in the P1 morning over to Marita Ulvskog likened People's Party bagatelliseringar at it as a rape victim always hear in court. The parable was not the best spot I've heard, if you say so, but I understand it. Just as absurd as it is to blame a rape victim for being responsible because she dressed too provocatively as unreasonable is it to accuse the Social Democrats to the Liberal Party had broken into their database. But do not think Helena Dyrssen she tries instead to spin off the line to Marita Ulvskog should ask rape victims to apologize. I do not believe that the Liberal Party is a party without people with spinal, but I am really starting to wonder.
I dare put a hundred on that Leijonborg remain. Electorate is (amazingly) not as impressionable /'re up as you might think. They can hopefully see beyond this kind of event and concentrate on the election campaign will be about: substantive issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment